Comments on: Grab that Invocation http://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/ RANDOMIZE USR 0 Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:00:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: rel=me » Blog Archive » Invoking forwardhttp://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/comment-page-1/#comment-22267 rel=me » Blog Archive » Invoking forward Fri, 22 May 2009 06:10:56 +0000 http://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/#comment-22267 <p>[...] there is a better way. In a post called ‘Grab that Invocation‘ and later at Dave Dribbin’s post ‘Invoke on Main Thread‘ we can see how to [...]</p> [...] there is a better way. In a post called ‘Grab that Invocation‘ and later at Dave Dribbin’s post ‘Invoke on Main Thread‘ we can see how to [...]

]]> By: chromehttp://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/comment-page-1/#comment-22298 chrome Sun, 04 Jan 2009 06:43:27 +0000 http://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/#comment-22298 <p>Great work; saved me a bunch of time writing this myself.</p> Great work; saved me a bunch of time writing this myself.

]]> By: chromehttp://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/comment-page-1/#comment-22219 chrome Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:43:27 +0000 http://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/#comment-22219 <p>Great work; saved me a bunch of time writing this myself.</p> Great work; saved me a bunch of time writing this myself.

]]> By: Richard Stacpoolehttp://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/comment-page-1/#comment-22078 Richard Stacpoole Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:49:54 +0000 http://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/#comment-22078 <p>Thanks,<br><br>I have just started using NSInvocation, and this will be useful.<br><br>Also there is a bug in your first code box, you have &firstArgument twice.</p> Thanks,

I have just started using NSInvocation, and this will be useful.

Also there is a bug in your first code box, you have &firstArgument twice.

]]> By: Richard Stacpoolehttp://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/comment-page-1/#comment-1078 Richard Stacpoole Thu, 07 Sep 2006 09:49:54 +0000 http://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/#comment-1078 <p>Thanks,</p><p>I have just started using NSInvocation, and this will be useful.</p><p>Also there is a bug in your first code box, you have &firstArgument twice.</p> Thanks,

I have just started using NSInvocation, and this will be useful.

Also there is a bug in your first code box, you have &firstArgument twice.

]]> By: Lexical » Archive » NSInvocation in Practicehttp://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/comment-page-1/#comment-421 Lexical » Archive » NSInvocation in Practice Tue, 27 Jun 2006 05:51:11 +0000 http://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/#comment-421 <p>[...] There’ve been a few mentions of NSInvocation recently. I have to agree about how useful it can be, and wanted to mention a few specific places I used it in Lexicon. [...]</p> [...] There’ve been a few mentions of NSInvocation recently. I have to agree about how useful it can be, and wanted to mention a few specific places I used it in Lexicon. [...]

]]> By: Daniel Jalkuthttp://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/comment-page-1/#comment-22077 Daniel Jalkut Sun, 25 Jun 2006 15:19:49 +0000 http://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/#comment-22077 <p>Nice work! One possible enhancement might be to change the invocation "capture" so that it can record multiples on an array. Then the client could ask for an array of all invocations sent to it. It could even sport a "performInvocationsOnObject:" method.<br><br>Also, the name "CInvocationRecorder" might better represent what this thing does, especially if multi-recording was added.</p> Nice work! One possible enhancement might be to change the invocation “capture” so that it can record multiples on an array. Then the client could ask for an array of all invocations sent to it. It could even sport a “performInvocationsOnObject:” method.

Also, the name “CInvocationRecorder” might better represent what this thing does, especially if multi-recording was added.

]]> By: Daniel Jalkuthttp://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/comment-page-1/#comment-401 Daniel Jalkut Sun, 25 Jun 2006 14:19:49 +0000 http://toxicsoftware.com/grab-that-invocation/#comment-401 <p>Nice work! One possible enhancement might be to change the invocation "capture" so that it can record multiples on an array. Then the client could ask for an array of all invocations sent to it. It could even sport a "performInvocationsOnObject:" method.</p><p>Also, the name "CInvocationRecorder" might better represent what this thing does, especially if multi-recording was added.</p> Nice work! One possible enhancement might be to change the invocation “capture” so that it can record multiples on an array. Then the client could ask for an array of all invocations sent to it. It could even sport a “performInvocationsOnObject:” method.

Also, the name “CInvocationRecorder” might better represent what this thing does, especially if multi-recording was added.

]]>